19th October, 2015, in Family Law, Divorce, Supreme Court.
A new Supreme Court Case this week signalled a ‘significant change’ in the law when it comes to reopening divorce settlements.
If a husband (or wife) manages to pull the financial wool over the eyes of their former spouse the Supreme Court this week revisited the law determining when it was right to re-open a financial settlement in the situation where one spouse didn’t disclose relevant information.
What could this mean for those who have already agreed a settlement?
Please feel free to sa/ help with this, or any other area of law.
Related 'Supreme Court' Posts
20 February, in SUPREME COURT, JOINT ENTERPRISE, CRIMINAL LAW
Law On Joint Enterprise 'Wrong' Says Supreme Court
If someone was convicted under the principle of ‘joint enterprise’ that is, not that t…